The results of the most recent java.net poll suggest that the JavaFX 2.0 Beta release is drawing mixed reviews from the developer community. A total of 58 votes were cast, and the voters posted seven comments. The exact poll question and results were:
Do you intend to experiment with the JavaFX 2.0 Beta Release?
- 14% (8 votes) - I'm already working with it
- 17% (10 votes) - I've downloaded it, but haven't yet experimented much
- 14% (8 votes) - I intend to download JavaFX 2.0 Beta soon
- 12% (7 votes) - I'll wait for the JavaFX 2.0 final release
- 21% (12 votes) - I have no interest in JavaFX
- 12% (7 votes) - I don't know
- 10% (6 votes) - Other
These numbers are pretty unusual among java.net polls: no response option garnered more than 21% of the cast votes.
Doing some summing, about 45% of the voters have downloaded JavaFX 2.0 Beta, or plan to do so soon. Another 12% might eventually download the Beta (they selected the "I don't know" option). And 12% plan to download JavaFX 2.0 when the final release comes out. So, we can say that about 70% of the voters expressed some interest in JavaFX 2.0.
On the other hand, 21% said "I have no interest in JavaFX," and 10% selected "Other." The seven comments were likely posted by people who selected one of these options.
mclarke4stated the complaint against the current JavaFX in his representative comment:
I was using JavaFX before but since there is no plan for a Linux release in the final version what is the point? JavaFX certainly won't be cross-platform so whats the point of using it unless you want to be locked in to a platform?
Among many developers, this remains a key problem for JavaFX. The JavaFX 2.0 Beta System Requirements page shows that JavaFX 2.0 is a Windows-only framework at present. It's not clear if support of Mac and Linux is upcoming. For example, a search of the JavaFX 2.0 Roadmap turns up no mention of Mac or Linux.
New poll: java.net's new Maven repo manager
Our new poll asks What's your view of the addition of Sonatype's Nexus Maven repository manager to the java.net project stack? Voting will be open until Friday, July 8.
- Fabrizio Giudici, A Cleaner MVC Inspired by Continuation-Passing Style;
- Artem Ananiev, JavaFX 2.0: how to size your windows easily;
- John O'Connor, Encoding URLs for non-ASCI query params;
- Cay Horstmann, In Praise of Language Specs; and
- John Ferguson Smart, Completing the circle - Automated web tests as a team communication tool.
Our latest java.net article is "A Method for Reducing Contention and Overhead in Worker Queues for Multithreaded Java Applications", by Sathiskumar Palaniappan, Kavitha Varadarajan, and Jayashree Viswanathan.
Here are the stories we've recently featured in our Java news section:
- Dustin Marx discusses Java at Oracle OpenWorld 2011;
- John Yeary discusses the article in SD Times: Inside the Java Community Process;
- The Brussels JUG presents JavaZone X - The Streaming;
- Hartmut Schlosser announces the JAX Innovation Awards 2011: The Winners are...;
- Peter Pilgrim notes that Scala Adoption Seems To Going Well;
- John Yeary provides a NetBeans 7.0 Tip: Generating SerialVersionUID for Serializable Objects;
- Dustin Marx writes about the New Java SE 7 Javadoc API Documentation Appearance;
- James Sugrue presents Eclipse Indigo Release Train Now Available: 46 Million Lines of Code Across 62 Projects;
- Ilias Tsagklis investigates Java Pretty Good Privacy (PGP);
- Mark Reinhold asks JDK 7: Are we there yet? Then answers;
- Tori Wieldt anticipates Best Party of 2011: Introducing Java 7; and
- The voting has now ended, but it's still worth reading Jessica Thornsby's Who's Your Top Java Ambassador? Even the people who won't end up winning deserve our attention and praise.
Our latest java.net Spotlight is Yolande Poirier's Java and Parallelism Computing: An Interview with Java Developer and Researcher Dr. Gilda Garret