sb92075 wrote:This is of course correct but I'd like to avoid that. On the other hand I have no clue where to start analyzing, moreover I cannot reproduce this. So it might take weeks to get any valuable result.Michael-O wrote:The other option is to do nothing & live with the (occasional?) deadlocks.
That's easier said than done. Identifying that code is really hefty. I try a few options on the static method and see if this really applies.