This content has been marked as final. Show 2 replies
SafeTypeMapping would probably help there if you dont mind the data being converted to a string.
If you dont want to use SafeTypeMapping, do you actually need the full precision you have the number datatype defined as? Perhaps you could redefine the datatype with less precision?
Hope it helps, corrections/comments welcome.
Gold! thank you SafeMapping is what I needed, and yes I need this precision.