This content has been marked as final. Show 3 replies
Yes I did recreate the tapi and capi. It's only going wrong for the combination of an update and a delete action on the same record within a transaction. If I only delete a record within a transaction the headstart code is working fine, then I see a "DEL" record in the journal table. This is also the case for insert and update actions.
Maybe the problem has something to do with the procedure perform_business_rule in qms_transaction_mgt. When performing business-rules headstart keeps track of records that are deleted during transaction. This is a comment in the procedure:
-- 126.96.36.199 Do NOT perform the business rule when the key is present in g_del_stack
-- (this is a stack with rules that can be omitted: it concerns deleted rows)
Perhaps a side effect of this mechanism is this problem I encounter. The reason for this, I noticed that the capi code that performs the writing to the journal table is treated as a business-rule by headstart. I became aware of this when I executed capi procedure disable_all_br. First I expected that the journalling code in the capi would not be effected by this procedure, but to my surprise it was. That's the reason I suspect the g_del_stack mechanism for not performing the journalling code in the capi trigger.
Does this ring a bell? And do you know how to solve this?