Discussions
Join us for complimentary one-day events around the world and step into a future fueled by AI and limitless potential. Explore new breakthroughs, sharpen your skills, and connect with experts who are shaping what’s next. Experience bold keynotes, interactive learning, and connections that span the global NetSuite community. Discover what's next at SuiteConnect Tour 2026.
NetSuite has launched SuiteSuccess Wholesale Distribution Edition, in Japan. Please join us the webinar on February 12 that introduces NetSuite solution with demos and case studies for Wholesale Industry.
Register Now
Have questions or experiences to share? Post your Release 2026.1 questions and join discussions in the Release 2026.1 category.
Intelligent Payment Automation, powered by BILL (formerly Bill.com), lets you automate payments, manage vendor details, and bank account information within NetSuite.
The SuiteApp is available to organizations based in the U.S. with a valid U.S. address, or to global customers (except Canada, China, and Japan) with U.S. business subsidiaries. It only supports payments to vendors operating in the United States.
For more information, visit this thread.
Vendor Manager report
Hi guys,
We have in the company a dozen or so Vendor Managers. Every each of them is looking after dozen or so Vendors ... This is fairly dynamic relationship. For every Vendor Manager I have created set of reports, i.e. Profitatiblity, Back Order etc ... As they change very often, I have to maintain all those reports changing Vendors in criteria. This is time consuming.
What would be goot to have is let`s say a custom field on the Supplier record, called let`s say `Manager`. With this in mind I would assign every Supplier/Vendor to specific Vendor Manager. Then on reports the filter I have in mind would be : Vendor = mine (or something similar). NetSuite would be looking at this custom field and if I am logged in as Vendor Manager ABC, it would find all Supplier/Vendor records which contain my name under `Manager` on the Supplier record and this would be filtered by. Going forward all I would have to change is