Discussions
Stay up-to-date with the latest news from NetSuite. You’ll be in the know about how to connect with peers and take your business to new heights at our virtual, in-person, on demand events, and much more.
New AI Community Guidelines. Please review and follow them to ensure AI use stays safe, accurate, and compliant.
Keep an eye out for upcoming NetSuite events, including meetups, workshops, and webinars. These sessions are a great way to connect with peers, learn from experts, and stay current on the latest NetSuite updates and best practices. Registration links are provided in each event.
Save $300 - limited to first 1,000 registrants
Join the NetSuite community to innovate, connect, and discover what’s next.
SuiteWorld brings thousands of innovators, builders, and leaders together to learn, connect, and shape what’s next. This October, explore how to build a stronger foundation for growth through inspiring keynotes, major product reveals, hands-on sessions, and unforgettable moments—all in one place for our biggest event of the year. Register now
Join the NetSuite community to innovate, connect, and discover what’s next.
SuiteWorld brings thousands of innovators, builders, and leaders together to learn, connect, and shape what’s next. This October, explore how to build a stronger foundation for growth through inspiring keynotes, major product reveals, hands-on sessions, and unforgettable moments—all in one place for our biggest event of the year. Register now
Apache Axis stub classes: "code too large" error
With or prior to one of the 2010 releases, Netsuite made a patched version of Apache Axis available that prevented constructors from exceeding 255 parameters, which caused an error during compilation in java. I'm now trying to upgrade our Suitetalk code to 2011.1 and am now getting a "code too large" error. It appears to be in the stub code for NetSuiteBindingStub. The function that defines the webservice methods exceeds java's limit of 64k in a single function. Are there any patched versions of Axis available that prevent both the 255+ parameter issue and the 64k+ function size issue?
0