Categories
FAW HCM - Workforce Rewards - Payroll Balances Offering
Comments
-
Hi Nate , for time being please use balance definition option.
Regards,
Nupur
0 -
Please use Analytics Warehouse Balance Group from now onwards. If you were already using FAW payroll balances offering with Global BI Balance group then please move your setup to Analytics Warehouse Balance Group. Any setup existing/changed in the Global BI balance group will not get reflected in FAW.
0 -
Hi Nupur, is there an official Oracle document for this implementation and setup tasks?
0 -
@Nupur Joshi-Oracle is there any update on your September 2022 post regarding using default inclusions for the Analytics Warehouse Balance Group?
Can customers use the default inclusions now?
Being able to use default inclusions would make overall Maintenace easier vs the balance definition approach.
0 -
@Nupur Joshi-Oracle - Following up on whether there is an update on any official documentation to implement the FAW balance group.
1 -
Is there a latest documentation on the Balance Group definition that you have posted above? We are currently in 24D and some of the Base Category name / Dimension names aren't matching with what we have in our SaaS POD. Appreciate pointers to latest documentation on this. Thank you. For Eg: There is no Tax Deduction or Employer Charges as Category. But we have Employee Tax Deduction, Employer Liabilities as option. On the Dimension name, we couldn't find 1) Relationship Tax Unit, Reference Code1,2 Run 2)Relationship Reference Code1,2 Run 3)Relationship Province, Reference Code Run. We are trying to complete this for US Legislative group
0
