Forum Stats

  • 3,855,134 Users
  • 2,264,463 Discussions
  • 7,905,907 Comments

Discussions

eulapi do not work

User_793RR
User_793RR Member Posts: 5 Red Ribbon
edited Nov 9, 2017 7:10AM in Discoverer

[[email protected] bin]$ eulapi -CONNECT XXXX/[email protected] -EUL EUL_ZHS -REVOKE_PRIVILEGE -WORKBOOK_ACCESS "LSG_V_M_SUPPLIER_MASTER" -APPS_RESPONSIBILITY "0100 FA Super User"

-connect <**********>

-eul EUL_ZHS

-revoke_privilege

-workbook_access LSG_V_M_SUPPLIER_MASTER

-apps_responsibility 0100 FA Super User

Command completed.

After complete, the workbook still shared to "0100 FA Super User", i expect workbook cannot be accessed by that responsibility., anything wrong on above command?

Kindly help. Thanks.

Answers

  • sbeck-Oracle
    sbeck-Oracle Member Posts: 116 Employee
    edited Nov 1, 2017 12:25PM

    I see an SR opened with Oracle Support for this issue.  Please work through the issue with product support. 

  • User_793RR
    User_793RR Member Posts: 5 Red Ribbon
    edited Nov 7, 2017 6:05AM

    SR Support still cannot solve the problem, Now we found below error , do you know the solution?

    eulapi -connect sysadmin/[email protected] -eul EUL_US -apps_user  -apps_responsibility "0100 FA Super User" -apps_gwuid "applsyspub/pub" -apps_fndnam apps -revoke_privilege -workbook_access "LSG_V_M_SUPPLIER_MASTER" -apps_responsibility "0100 FA Super User"

    -connect <**********>

    -eul EUL_US

    -apps_user

    -apps_responsibility 0100 FA Super User

    -apps_gwuid applsyspub/pub

    -apps_fndnam apps

    -revoke_privilege

    -workbook_access LSG_V_M_SUPPLIER_MASTER

    -apps_responsibility 0100 FA Super User

    You have not specified a valid responsibility for your username (either on the command line or in the connect string).

  • sbeck-Oracle
    sbeck-Oracle Member Posts: 116 Employee
    edited Nov 9, 2017 7:10AM

    Please continue to work with Oracle Support in the SR that is open.  Also bear in mind Discoverer is at end of life.  Premier support ended more than 3 years ago. 

This discussion has been closed.