Discussions
Categories
- 196K All Categories
- 2.1K Data
- 209 Big Data Appliance
- 1.9K Data Science
- 447.4K Databases
- 220.8K General Database Discussions
- 3.7K Java and JavaScript in the Database
- 23 Multilingual Engine
- 516 MySQL Community Space
- 463 NoSQL Database
- 7.8K Oracle Database Express Edition (XE)
- 2.9K ORDS, SODA & JSON in the Database
- 469 SQLcl
- 3.9K SQL Developer Data Modeler
- 185.9K SQL & PL/SQL
- 20.9K SQL Developer
- 292.6K Development
- 7 Developer Projects
- 124 Programming Languages
- 289.4K Development Tools
- 95 DevOps
- 3K QA/Testing
- 645.5K Java
- 23 Java Learning Subscription
- 36.9K Database Connectivity
- 150 Java Community Process
- 104 Java 25
- 22.1K Java APIs
- 137.8K Java Development Tools
- 165.3K Java EE (Java Enterprise Edition)
- 15 Java Essentials
- 143 Java 8 Questions
- 85.9K Java Programming
- 79 Java Puzzle Ball
- 65.1K New To Java
- 1.7K Training / Learning / Certification
- 13.8K Java HotSpot Virtual Machine
- 94.2K Java SE
- 13.8K Java Security
- 197 Java User Groups
- 24 JavaScript - Nashorn
- Programs
- 239 LiveLabs
- 35 Workshops
- 10.2K Software
- 6.7K Berkeley DB Family
- 3.5K JHeadstart
- 5.8K Other Languages
- 2.3K Chinese
- 166 Deutsche Oracle Community
- 1.2K Español
- 1.9K Japanese
- 225 Portuguese
Help required on JVM stack memory.
947530
Member Posts: 1
Hi,
My webapp using the java 6 - 64 bit, which is running on Linux machine. The JVM process of my webapps consuming 64MB chunk of memory in stack whereas ulimit of Linux machine is 10 MB and -Xss of JVM, as jvm argument is 1MB. This JVM behavior is quite confusing for us. Can anybody help us? Immediate reply is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Hrushi.
My webapp using the java 6 - 64 bit, which is running on Linux machine. The JVM process of my webapps consuming 64MB chunk of memory in stack whereas ulimit of Linux machine is 10 MB and -Xss of JVM, as jvm argument is 1MB. This JVM behavior is quite confusing for us. Can anybody help us? Immediate reply is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Hrushi.
Tagged:
This discussion has been closed.