Skip to Main Content
Forums

ODP.NET

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Interested in getting your voice heard by members of the Developer Marketing team at Oracle? Check out this post for AppDev or this post for AI focus group information.

How to identify ODAC version ?

Guillaume.DebraJan 8 2014 — edited Jan 9 2014

Hi members,

Our apps are developed with Entity Framework 4 and 5.

EF5 is certified with Oracle ODAC Release 5 (11.2.0.3.20)

Version 11.2.0.3.20

  • .NET Framework 4.5 certification
  • Entity Framework 5

Version 11.2.0.3.0

  • ADO.NET Entity Framework 4 and LINQ to Entities
  • WCF Data Services and OData
  • Implicit REF CURSOR Parameter Binding

If I check on download page for Odac (64-bit Oracle Data Access Components (ODAC) for Windows)) I see all providers are in 11.2.0.3.0

But on our existing servers with Odac installed, how to identify if ODAC is in Release 4 or Release 5 ?

Which files check ?

Another question it's possible Oracle Client 11.2.0.3 is installed on existing servers. But ODAC is a component of Oracle Client 11.2.0.3 ... anyelse kowns if it's ODAC Release 4 or 5 ?

Thanks beforehand for any help.
This post has been answered by Alex Keh-Oracle on Jan 9 2014
Jump to Answer

Comments

21205
Answer
I think this will do the same 
SQL> with t1 as (select 1 id, 'a' vol, 100 amount from dual union all
  2              select 1 id, 'c' vol, 200 amount from dual union all
  3              select 1 id, 'd' vol, 300 amount from dual union all
  4              select 2 id, 'b' vol, 400 amount from dual),
  5       t2 as (select 'b' vol, 1 order_index from dual union all
  6              select 'd' vol, 2 order_index from dual union all
  7              select 'a' vol, 3 order_index from dual union all
  8              select 'c' vol, 4 order_index from dual)
  9  select t1.id
 10      , t2.vol
 11      , nvl (t1.amount, 0)
 12      , t2.order_index
 13    from t1
 14        partition by (id)
 15        right outer
 16        join t2
 17        on (t1.vol = t2.vol)
 18  order by t1.id, order_index
 19  /

        ID V NVL(T1.AMOUNT,0) ORDER_INDEX
---------- - ---------------- -----------
         1 b                0           1
         1 d              300           2
         1 a              100           3
         1 c              200           4
         2 b              400           1
         2 d                0           2
         2 a                0           3
         2 c                0           4

8 rows selected.
(if you're on Oracle 10)

missed the final ORDER BY

Edited by: Alex Nuijten on Jun 19, 2009 10:23 AM
Marked as Answer by Boneist · Sep 27 2020
Boneist
Ooh, that's very nifty!

Thanks... guess I'm going to have to get past my aversion to the ANSI join syntax, aren't I?! That's a very useful trick, and one I wasn't aware of.
21205
:)

and here's the Tahiti link: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_10002.htm#i2177515

(to up your Tahiti-Fu skills ;) )
1 person found this helpful
Nicolas Gasparotto
What about code from old school time ? 
SQL> with t1 as (select 1 id, 'a' vol, 100 amount from dual union all
  2              select 1 id, 'c' vol, 200 amount from dual union all
  3              select 1 id, 'd' vol, 300 amount from dual union all
  4              select 2 id, 'b' vol, 400 amount from dual),
  5       t2 as (select 'b' vol, 1 order_index from dual union all
  6              select 'd' vol, 2 order_index from dual union all
  7              select 'a' vol, 3 order_index from dual union all
  8              select 'c' vol, 4 order_index from dual)
  9  select a.id, b.vol,sum(decode(a.vol,b.vol,a.amount,0)) amount
 10  from   t1 a, t2 b
 11  group by a.id, b.vol,b.order_index
 12  order by a.id, b.order_index;

        ID V     AMOUNT
---------- - ----------
         1 b          0
         1 d        300
         1 a        100
         1 c        200
         2 b        400
         2 d          0
         2 a          0
         2 c          0

8 rows selected.
Nicolas.
1 person found this helpful
Aketi Jyuuzou
575147

I like Left Join better than Right Join ;-)
1 person found this helpful
21205
Aketi Jyuuzou wrote:
I like Left Join better than Right Join ;-)
... we aim to please: 
SQL> with t1 as (select 1 id, 'a' vol, 100 amount from dual union all
  2              select 1 id, 'c' vol, 200 amount from dual union all
  3              select 1 id, 'd' vol, 300 amount from dual union all
  4              select 2 id, 'b' vol, 400 amount from dual),
  5       t2 as (select 'b' vol, 1 order_index from dual union all
  6              select 'd' vol, 2 order_index from dual union all
  7              select 'a' vol, 3 order_index from dual union all
  8              select 'c' vol, 4 order_index from dual)
  9  select t1.id
 10      , t2.vol
 11      , nvl (t1.amount, 0)
 12      , t2.order_index
 13    from t2 left outer
 14        join
 15        t1
 16        partition by (id)
 17        on (t1.vol = t2.vol)
 18  order by t1.id, order_index
 19  /

        ID V NVL(T1.AMOUNT,0) ORDER_INDEX
---------- - ---------------- -----------
         1 b                0           1
         1 d              300           2
         1 a              100           3
         1 c              200           4
         2 b              400           1
         2 d                0           2
         2 a                0           3
         2 c                0           4

8 rows selected.
;)
1 person found this helpful
1 - 6
Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.

Post Details

Locked on Feb 6 2014
Added on Jan 8 2014
#11g, #odp-net
3 comments
16,342 views