Discussions
Categories
- 197K All Categories
- 2.5K Data
- 546 Big Data Appliance
- 1.9K Data Science
- 450.9K Databases
- 221.9K General Database Discussions
- 3.8K Java and JavaScript in the Database
- 31 Multilingual Engine
- 552 MySQL Community Space
- 479 NoSQL Database
- 7.9K Oracle Database Express Edition (XE)
- 3.1K ORDS, SODA & JSON in the Database
- 556 SQLcl
- 4K SQL Developer Data Modeler
- 187.2K SQL & PL/SQL
- 21.4K SQL Developer
- 296.4K Development
- 17 Developer Projects
- 139 Programming Languages
- 293.1K Development Tools
- 111 DevOps
- 3.1K QA/Testing
- 646.1K Java
- 28 Java Learning Subscription
- 37K Database Connectivity
- 161 Java Community Process
- 105 Java 25
- 22.1K Java APIs
- 138.2K Java Development Tools
- 165.3K Java EE (Java Enterprise Edition)
- 19 Java Essentials
- 162 Java 8 Questions
- 86K Java Programming
- 81 Java Puzzle Ball
- 65.1K New To Java
- 1.7K Training / Learning / Certification
- 13.8K Java HotSpot Virtual Machine
- 94.3K Java SE
- 13.8K Java Security
- 205 Java User Groups
- 24 JavaScript - Nashorn
- Programs
- 475 LiveLabs
- 39 Workshops
- 10.2K Software
- 6.7K Berkeley DB Family
- 3.5K JHeadstart
- 5.7K Other Languages
- 2.3K Chinese
- 175 Deutsche Oracle Community
- 1.1K Español
- 1.9K Japanese
- 233 Portuguese
javadoc 8 can't find class in @see reference, but java 7 did

Will Pittenger
Member Posts: 31
I have a project with several related projects. Two of the projects are executable jars with the third, Tools, being classes the two share. javadoc is having troubles compiling Tools and I can't see why. It has only happened since I migrated to Java 8. I never saw this issue with Java 7. The classes I'm referencing with @see are the correct syntax and name. But each @see to one of the other jars results in an error and the javadoc tool returns an error rather than succeeding. If I link from the other jars to Tools' javadoc, @see works just fine.
Can someone tell me what's going on? I added -link commands which the javadoc tool seems to accept, but it still can't find those classes.
This discussion has been closed.