Skip to Main Content

Oracle Forms

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Interested in getting your voice heard by members of the Developer Marketing team at Oracle? Check out this post for AppDev or this post for AI focus group information.

FIND_TREE_NODE behaviour difference in 6i and 11g.

Manu.Nov 26 2015 — edited Nov 26 2015

Dear All,

we have applications in 6i and 11g. In one of the form, there is a tree control, and we have a facility to search the data within the tree data using FIND_TREE_NODE built-in. In 6i, the searching works fine by giving the starting charactors. But the same is not working in 11g application. In 11g, if the full label is given, then only it is finding the node. Is there any way to work this in 11g forms too?

Manu.

Comments

Cortanamo

Apparently documentation mentions ORDS_METADATA schema. I suppose that exporting it from one to the other instance should be sufficient, plus maybe enabling ORDS for schemas and tables that should be accessable to ORDS. But this looks like a bit of a workaround. Is there really nothing better?

there's 2 pieces, ORDS, and the Services.

ORDS can be moved by simply packing up the WAR file and moving to the new location, or just re-installing it.

The services are defined in the REST-enabled schema.

You can export the modules to PL/SQL scripts, which can then be ran in your new environment.

I'd recommend you Source Control these scripts, so you can track changes, and easily build deployment/upgrade packages.

1 - 2
Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.

Post Details

Locked on Dec 24 2015
Added on Nov 26 2015
0 comments
435 views