Discussions
Categories
- 385.5K All Categories
- 5.1K Data
- 2.5K Big Data Appliance
- 2.5K Data Science
- 453.4K Databases
- 223.2K General Database Discussions
- 3.8K Java and JavaScript in the Database
- 47 Multilingual Engine
- 606 MySQL Community Space
- 486 NoSQL Database
- 7.9K Oracle Database Express Edition (XE)
- 3.2K ORDS, SODA & JSON in the Database
- 585 SQLcl
- 4K SQL Developer Data Modeler
- 188K SQL & PL/SQL
- 21.5K SQL Developer
- 46 Data Integration
- 46 GoldenGate
- 298.4K Development
- 4 Application Development
- 20 Developer Projects
- 166 Programming Languages
- 295K Development Tools
- 150 DevOps
- 3.1K QA/Testing
- 646.7K Java
- 37 Java Learning Subscription
- 37.1K Database Connectivity
- 201 Java Community Process
- 108 Java 25
- 22.2K Java APIs
- 138.3K Java Development Tools
- 165.4K Java EE (Java Enterprise Edition)
- 22 Java Essentials
- 176 Java 8 Questions
- 86K Java Programming
- 82 Java Puzzle Ball
- 65.1K New To Java
- 1.7K Training / Learning / Certification
- 13.8K Java HotSpot Virtual Machine
- 94.3K Java SE
- 13.8K Java Security
- 208 Java User Groups
- 25 JavaScript - Nashorn
- Programs
- 667 LiveLabs
- 41 Workshops
- 10.3K Software
- 6.7K Berkeley DB Family
- 3.6K JHeadstart
- 6K Other Languages
- 2.3K Chinese
- 207 Deutsche Oracle Community
- 1.1K Español
- 1.9K Japanese
- 474 Portuguese
Inconsistent handling of operator delete

koval
Member Posts: 72 Blue Ribbon
Studio 12.5 and 12.6 incorrectly handles operator delete(void*, size_t) in constructor initializer list.
The following code sample shows the problem.
#include <new>class C { friend class D; friend class E; void* operator new(std::size_t); void operator delete(void*); void operator delete(void*, std::size_t) = delete;};class D { C* c; D(): c(new C) { }};class E { C* c = new C;};
Error:
line 15: Error: Using deleted function 'static C::operator delete(void*, unsigned)'.1 Error(s) detected.
As you can see, no error is reported in class E where C::operator new is called in direct initializer. In class D same expression is not accepted in constructor initializer list.
Comments
-
The code example compiles in C++11 mode, but in not C++14 mode.
Thanks for reporting this issue. I have filed bug 26663195 for you.
If you have a service contract for Studio, you can escalate this bug and get it fixed in a patch.
This discussion has been closed.