- 3,714,818 Users
- 2,242,634 Discussions
- 7,845,078 Comments
Forum Stats
Discussions
Categories
- 12 Data
- 362.2K Big Data Appliance
- 6 Data Science
- 1.5K Databases
- 447 General Database Discussions
- 3.7K Java and JavaScript in the Database
- 22 Multilingual Engine
- 487 MySQL Community Space
- 3 NoSQL Database
- 7.6K Oracle Database Express Edition (XE)
- 2.7K ORDS, SODA & JSON in the Database
- 415 SQLcl
- 42 SQL Developer Data Modeler
- 184.8K SQL & PL/SQL
- 21K SQL Developer
- 1.8K Development
- 3 Developer Projects
- 32 Programming Languages
- 135K Development Tools
- 7 DevOps
- 3K QA/Testing
- 236 Java
- 4 Java Learning Subscription
- 10 Database Connectivity
- 65 Java Community Process
- Java 25
- 8 Java APIs
- 141.1K Java Development Tools
- 5 Java EE (Java Enterprise Edition)
- 153K Java Essentials
- 134 Java 8 Questions
- 86.2K Java Programming
- 270 Java Lambda MOOC
- 65.1K New To Java
- 1.7K Training / Learning / Certification
- 13.8K Java HotSpot Virtual Machine
- 10 Java SE
- 13.8K Java Security
- 3 Java User Groups
- 22 JavaScript - Nashorn
- 18 Programs
- 118 LiveLabs
- 28 Workshops
- 9 Software
- 3 Berkeley DB Family
- 3.5K JHeadstart
- 5.7K Other Languages
- 2.3K Chinese
- 3 Deutsche Oracle Community
- 10 Español
- 1.9K Japanese
- 2 Portuguese
Moving to CDB architecture
Dear Maestros,
Most application vendors are reluctant to move towards oracle CDB environment although this is more than 4-5 years old features. All they mention oracle with non CDB. But ,our plan is to move towards CDB architecture since oracle 20c onwards this is compulsory.
Now, My concern is ,what actually needs to address while moving towards CDB or what prohibits from going to CDB.
It would be great to have some feedback from those who went through what I am facing now.
Cheers..
Best Answer
-
For the end user / application, so long as you are using service names in your connection strings (as opposed to SIDs) then it's exactly the same between a non CDB to a PDB. There were some newer things that weren't fully ported to the multitenant in the initial releases but they've all been cleared up now.
Answers
-
For the end user / application, so long as you are using service names in your connection strings (as opposed to SIDs) then it's exactly the same between a non CDB to a PDB. There were some newer things that weren't fully ported to the multitenant in the initial releases but they've all been cleared up now.