Discussions
Categories
- 385K All Categories
- 2.5K Data
- 580 Big Data Appliance
- 2K Data Science
- 452K Databases
- 222.3K General Database Discussions
- 3.8K Java and JavaScript in the Database
- 32 Multilingual Engine
- 575 MySQL Community Space
- 479 NoSQL Database
- 7.9K Oracle Database Express Edition (XE)
- 3.1K ORDS, SODA & JSON in the Database
- 575 SQLcl
- 4K SQL Developer Data Modeler
- 187.7K SQL & PL/SQL
- 21.5K SQL Developer
- 11 Data Integration
- 11 GoldenGate
- 297.6K Development
- 3 Application Development
- 18 Developer Projects
- 140 Programming Languages
- 294.3K Development Tools
- 118 DevOps
- 3.1K QA/Testing
- 646.4K Java
- 30 Java Learning Subscription
- 37K Database Connectivity
- 185 Java Community Process
- 107 Java 25
- 22.1K Java APIs
- 138.3K Java Development Tools
- 165.3K Java EE (Java Enterprise Edition)
- 21 Java Essentials
- 172 Java 8 Questions
- 86K Java Programming
- 82 Java Puzzle Ball
- 65.1K New To Java
- 1.7K Training / Learning / Certification
- 13.8K Java HotSpot Virtual Machine
- 94.3K Java SE
- 13.8K Java Security
- 206 Java User Groups
- 24 JavaScript - Nashorn
- Programs
- 579 LiveLabs
- 41 Workshops
- 10.2K Software
- 6.7K Berkeley DB Family
- 3.5K JHeadstart
- 5.7K Other Languages
- 2.3K Chinese
- 191 Deutsche Oracle Community
- 1.1K Español
- 1.9K Japanese
- 240 Portuguese
Alternative to support Essbase Active/Passive clustering other than OCFS in RHEL?
User_VFWIA
Member Posts: 1 Green Ribbon
We have RHEL(Red-hat) Linux based essbase active passive clustering with NAS share drive with OCFS file system on it but our client request us to use another file system other then OCFS. So, any one can suggest me a best alternative to OCFS.