Forum Stats

  • 3,732,979 Users
  • 2,246,664 Discussions
  • 7,856,452 Comments

Discussions

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Log In Register

Categories

DAX offloading isn't offloading cores?

1336415
1336415 Member Posts: 12
edited March 2016 in Software in Silicon (Sample Code & Resources)

Hello,

According to http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/sun-sparc-enterprise/documentation/sparc-t7-m7-server-architecture-2702… "These engines can process 32 independent data streams, offloading the processor cores to do other work."

Let's try to pbind "yes > /dev/null" to all threads of single core and then launch vector_in_range() on one of the threads? One execution of vector_in_range() takes about 80ms (zone memory still not increased, case ID: 497386-1217697831), so we will run it in cycle. What we got is CPU time sharing:

   PID USERNAME USR SYS TRP TFL DFL LCK SLP LAT VCX ICX SCL SIG PROCESS/LWP 

  5334 dglushe*  99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0  60 68K   0 yes/1

  5327 dglushe*  99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0  60 68K   0 yes/1

  5336 dglushe*  99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0  60 68K   0 yes/1

  5330 dglushe*  99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0  60 68K   0 yes/1

  5332 dglushe*  99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0  60 68K   0 yes/1

  5340 dglushe*  99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0  60 68K   0 yes/1

  5338 dglushe*  99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0  60 68K   0 yes/1

  5345 dglushe*  46  14 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  39   0  48 .1M   0 dax-in-range/1

  5342 dglushe*  39 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  61   0  49 24K   0 yes/1

Most of the user time dax-in-range spends in following stack:

libdax.so.1`dax_read_results+0x1c4

libdax_query.so.1`dax_query_execute+0x160

libdax_query.so.1`dax_scan+0xdb4

vector.so`dax_scan+0x12c

vector.so`vectorScanStream+0x1d8

vector.so`vectorFilter+0x418

vector.so`vectorInRange+0x2c

vector.so`vector_in_range+0x24

dax-in-range`main+0x1d0

dax-in-range`_start+0x108

Is it poor vector.so that uses DAX ineffectively or the offloading statement is incorrect? vector_in_range() steals time from "yes > /dev/null".

Thank you.

Tagged:
· Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Best Answer

  • 1336415
    1336415 Member Posts: 12
    edited March 2016 Accepted Answer

    Oh, I see you shared dax.h. It seems that vector.so uses synchronous DAX calls, but dax.h states that there are asynchronous calls too:

    /* 
    NAME: dax_post - family of functions that post asynchronous dax requests
    SYNOPSIS:
  */
..




dax_status_t dax_scan_range_post(dax_queue_t *queue, uint64_t flags,



    dax_vec_t *src, dax_vec_t *dst, dax_compare_t op, dax_int_t *lower,



    dax_int_t *upper, void *udata);


    No more questions, thank you!

    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Answers

  • Yoda-Oracle
    Yoda-Oracle Member Posts: 5
    edited March 2016

    Hi,

    Your Zone now has 16GB of RAM. Please let me know if that is sufficient

    -Angelo

    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • 1336415
    1336415 Member Posts: 12
    edited March 2016

    Thank you. Now memory limit is sufficient.

    But CPU offloading still shows that while DAX doing its work - CPU core busy too.

    With new memory limit vector_in_range() takes 0,8 seconds to complete. Let's run it in cycle on the same thread id with "yes > /dev/null" (using pbind). Again, we see that yes shares CPU time with dax-in-range:

       PID USERNAME USR SYS TRP TFL DFL LCK SLP LAT VCX ICX SCL SIG PROCESS/LWP  

    19860 dglushe* 99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0  30 34K   0 yes/1

    19868 dglushe* 99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0  30 34K   0 yes/1

    19864 dglushe* 99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0  30 34K   0 yes/1

    19866 dglushe* 99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0  30 34K   0 yes/1

    19857 dglushe* 99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0  30 34K   0 yes/1

    19862 dglushe* 99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0  30 34K   0 yes/1

    19870 dglushe* 99 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0  30 34K   0 yes/1

    19880 dglushe* 50  15 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  35   1  23 .1M 0 dax-in-range/1

    19850 dglushe*  34 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  65 0  24 10K   0 yes/1

    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • 1336415
    1336415 Member Posts: 12
    edited March 2016 Accepted Answer

    Oh, I see you shared dax.h. It seems that vector.so uses synchronous DAX calls, but dax.h states that there are asynchronous calls too:

    /* 
    NAME: dax_post - family of functions that post asynchronous dax requests
    SYNOPSIS:
  */
..




dax_status_t dax_scan_range_post(dax_queue_t *queue, uint64_t flags,



    dax_vec_t *src, dax_vec_t *dst, dax_compare_t op, dax_int_t *lower,



    dax_int_t *upper, void *udata);


    No more questions, thank you!

    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Sign In or Register to comment.