Skip to Main Content

SQL & PL/SQL

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Interested in getting your voice heard by members of the Developer Marketing team at Oracle? Check out this post for AppDev or this post for AI focus group information.

Pivot/unpivot

Dorian GrimMar 6 2019 — edited Mar 11 2019

I am on Oracle Database 11g Express Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production

======

I need:

create table my_table_name 

(

  a varchar2(255)

  ,b varchar2(255)

  ,c varchar2(255)

  ,jan int

  ,feb int

  ,mar int

  ,apr int

);

insert into (a, b, c, jan, feb, mar, apr) values ('a', 'b', 'c', 11, 1, 12, 111);

abcjanfebmarapr
abc11112111

to look like:

abcdate_idval
abcjan11
abcfeb1
abcmar12
abcapr111

Could someone please help me achieve this?

I know of UNION, but I don't want to use it in hopes there's something already there for me, built-in.

with main as

(

  select

    'jan' date_id

    ,a

    ,b

    ,c

    ,jan as val

  from

    my_table_name

union all

  select

    'feb' date_id

    ,a

    ,b

    ,c

    ,feb as val

  from

    my_table_name

union all

  select

    'mar' date_id

    ,a

    ,b

    ,c

    ,mar as val

  from

    my_table_name

union all

  select

    'apr' date_id

    ,a

    ,b

    ,c

    ,apr as val

  from

    my_table_name

)

select * from main;

Thanks,

Dorian

This post has been answered by Frank Kulash on Mar 6 2019
Jump to Answer

Comments

843793
Well, this was a shot in the dark, but I tested it and it seems to be the problem: remove the parens around i.next()!

After doing so, running the code in your post instead provides a "NoSuchElementException" from the iterator (completely expected). I'm not sure if this a bug in the compiler, or if it has something to do with the way the code gets expanded. Maybe if someone thinks about it long enough they'll be able to come up with a reason.
843793
Why would you expect to use those parens like that anyway?
843793
Why would you expect to use those parens like that
anyway?
I can see that the parens are redundant - and as the other responder pointed out, the error goes away when they are removed...however, I'm still curious...

Firstly, is it actually an error to use the parentheses in that way?

Secondly, although the offending line is executed in the example I gave, the code that I pulled the example from is a bit stranger - when I try to instantiate a class (call it B), that contains a method with the redundant parentheses, I get the same error - even though the offending line isn't executed (I can post the code tonight if anyone is interested).

Gareth
843793
Here's the code:

import java.util.*;
class A {
public static void main (String argv[]) {
B bb = new B();
}
}

class B {

void methodC() {
ArrayList<Boolean> B = new ArrayList<Boolean>(10);
Iterator<Boolean> i = B.iterator();
boolean b = (i.next()).booleanValue();
}
}

843793
This is definitely a bug in the compiler. The bytecode generated for B.methodC() is:

Codeview "bytecode" for void B.methodC():
#3/Test.java:12 - new class java.util.ArrayList
#4/Test.java:12 - dup
#5/Test.java:12 - bipush (byte)10
#6/Test.java:12 - invokespecial public java.util.ArrayList(int)
#7/Test.java:12 - astore_1 lv_1
#8/Test.java:13 - aload_1 lv_1
#9/Test.java:13 - invokevirtual public java.util.Iterator java.util.AbstractList.iterator()
#10/Test.java:13 - astore_2 lv_2
#11/Test.java:14 - aload_2 lv_2
#12/Test.java:14 - invokeinterface public abstract java.lang.Object java.util.Iterator.next()
#13/Test.java:14 - invokevirtual public final boolean java.lang.Boolean.booleanValue()
#14/Test.java:14 - istore_3 lv_3
#15/Test.java:15 - return

and it's clear that between instruction #12 and instruction #14 a typecast is missing.

I'll add this to my list of known prototype compiler bugs at
http://cag.lcs.mit.edu/~cananian/Projects/GJ/
1 - 5

Post Details

Added on Mar 6 2019
13 comments
381 views