Discussions
Categories
- 196.7K All Categories
- 2.2K Data
- 235 Big Data Appliance
- 1.9K Data Science
- 449.8K Databases
- 221.5K General Database Discussions
- 3.8K Java and JavaScript in the Database
- 31 Multilingual Engine
- 549 MySQL Community Space
- 477 NoSQL Database
- 7.9K Oracle Database Express Edition (XE)
- 3K ORDS, SODA & JSON in the Database
- 532 SQLcl
- 4K SQL Developer Data Modeler
- 186.8K SQL & PL/SQL
- 21.2K SQL Developer
- 295.3K Development
- 17 Developer Projects
- 138 Programming Languages
- 292K Development Tools
- 104 DevOps
- 3.1K QA/Testing
- 645.9K Java
- 27 Java Learning Subscription
- 37K Database Connectivity
- 153 Java Community Process
- 105 Java 25
- 22.1K Java APIs
- 138.1K Java Development Tools
- 165.3K Java EE (Java Enterprise Edition)
- 17 Java Essentials
- 158 Java 8 Questions
- 85.9K Java Programming
- 79 Java Puzzle Ball
- 65.1K New To Java
- 1.7K Training / Learning / Certification
- 13.8K Java HotSpot Virtual Machine
- 94.2K Java SE
- 13.8K Java Security
- 203 Java User Groups
- 24 JavaScript - Nashorn
- Programs
- 390 LiveLabs
- 37 Workshops
- 10.2K Software
- 6.7K Berkeley DB Family
- 3.5K JHeadstart
- 5.6K Other Languages
- 2.3K Chinese
- 170 Deutsche Oracle Community
- 1K Español
- 1.9K Japanese
- 230 Portuguese
Sql Developer 18.4 - Snapshots View only shows snaps whose SnapID is less then 10000

Pierangelo Terzulli
Member Posts: 1 Green Ribbon
Hi,
Snapshot view from dba->Performances->Snapshots in SQL Developer 18.4 doesn't show snapshots entries whose snapid is greater than 9999. Is it a bug or is there a setting to limit the number of visibile snap entries in Snapshots view? Below a screenshot where you can see how the TreeView under DBA->Performances->Snapshots correcty shows greater than 9999 SnapIDs (the view is filtered by "Most Recent 10") but the corresponding view only shows snaps with snapid less than 10000.
the Image is available at https://imgur.com/a/QHCRhj6
Tagged:
Answers
-
I don't see a SQL predicate that would arbitrarily cut off entries at 10000, you should file an SR with MOS