Discussions
Categories
- 196.7K All Categories
- 2.2K Data
- 234 Big Data Appliance
- 1.9K Data Science
- 449.8K Databases
- 221.5K General Database Discussions
- 3.8K Java and JavaScript in the Database
- 31 Multilingual Engine
- 549 MySQL Community Space
- 477 NoSQL Database
- 7.9K Oracle Database Express Edition (XE)
- 3K ORDS, SODA & JSON in the Database
- 532 SQLcl
- 4K SQL Developer Data Modeler
- 186.8K SQL & PL/SQL
- 21.2K SQL Developer
- 295.3K Development
- 17 Developer Projects
- 138 Programming Languages
- 292K Development Tools
- 104 DevOps
- 3.1K QA/Testing
- 645.9K Java
- 27 Java Learning Subscription
- 37K Database Connectivity
- 153 Java Community Process
- 105 Java 25
- 22.1K Java APIs
- 138.1K Java Development Tools
- 165.3K Java EE (Java Enterprise Edition)
- 17 Java Essentials
- 157 Java 8 Questions
- 85.9K Java Programming
- 79 Java Puzzle Ball
- 65.1K New To Java
- 1.7K Training / Learning / Certification
- 13.8K Java HotSpot Virtual Machine
- 94.2K Java SE
- 13.8K Java Security
- 203 Java User Groups
- 24 JavaScript - Nashorn
- Programs
- 389 LiveLabs
- 37 Workshops
- 10.2K Software
- 6.7K Berkeley DB Family
- 3.5K JHeadstart
- 5.6K Other Languages
- 2.3K Chinese
- 170 Deutsche Oracle Community
- 1K Español
- 1.9K Japanese
- 230 Portuguese
multiple indexes Vs multi column index ?

userP5
Member Posts: 63 Blue Ribbon
I am using oracle 10g. I have a table with huge data. There are 4 indexes on this table with combination of columns. All the indexes are created using the script like -
CREATE INDEX INDX1 ON My_TABLE
(ID, emp_NUMBER, emp_sal, emp_div)
TABLESPACE my_IDX
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
NOLOGGING
NOPARALLEL;
CREATE INDEX INDX2 ON My_TABLE
(ID, emp_NUMBER, emp_name)
TABLESPACE my_IDX
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
NOLOGGING
NOPARALLEL;
and so on...
Few columns are always there in every index like Id, emp_number.
Most of the select queries are using the id and emp_number in the where clause criteria's. SQL "select" performance is not very good and need to find some kinda solution to this problem .
Shall I create one index using all the columns present in various indexes instead of various indexes with different combination of the columns ?
CREATE INDEX INDX1 ON My_TABLE
(ID, emp_NUMBER, emp_sal, emp_div)
TABLESPACE my_IDX
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
NOLOGGING
NOPARALLEL;
CREATE INDEX INDX2 ON My_TABLE
(ID, emp_NUMBER, emp_name)
TABLESPACE my_IDX
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
NOLOGGING
NOPARALLEL;
and so on...
Few columns are always there in every index like Id, emp_number.
Most of the select queries are using the id and emp_number in the where clause criteria's. SQL "select" performance is not very good and need to find some kinda solution to this problem .
Shall I create one index using all the columns present in various indexes instead of various indexes with different combination of the columns ?
Answers
-
Please realize that we don't have your tables & we don't have your data.
Therefore only YOU can run bechmark tests to see for yourself what produces the better results. -
userPrasad wrote:
I am using oracle 10g. I have a table with huge data. There are 4 indexes on this table with combination of columns. All the indexes are created using the script like -
CREATE INDEX INDX1 ON My_TABLE
(ID, emp_NUMBER, emp_sal, emp_div)
TABLESPACE my_IDX
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
NOLOGGING
NOPARALLEL;
CREATE INDEX INDX2 ON My_TABLE
(ID, emp_NUMBER, emp_name)
TABLESPACE my_IDX
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
NOLOGGING
NOPARALLEL;
and so on...
Few columns are always there in every index like Id, emp_number.
Most of the select queries are using the id and emp_number in the where clause criteria's. SQL "select" performance is not very good and need to find some kinda solution to this problem .
Shall I create one index using all the columns present in various indexes instead of various indexes with different combination of the columns ?CREATE INDEX INDX2 ON My_TABLE (ID, emp_NUMBER, emp_name)
andCREATE INDEX INDX2 ON My_TABLE (emp_name, emp_number, ID)
Both have the same collection of columns, but they most defianetly do not serve the same purpose. Once you understand that, you will have your answer.
This discussion has been closed.