<p>I was about to commend the moderators -- I mean,Images are not the problem. If they want to add support for images then great.
posting images is a <i>lot</i> less harmful than
posting links. I can post vulgar text just as easily
as images, and such is the behavior of an internet
How silly of me. I hadn't checked to see if they'd actually disallowed non-images in the url...Images are not the problem. If they want to add
support for images then great.
The problem is in how it is implemented currently.
This can be exploited to direct your browser against
your will to malicous sites that can do damage to
your browser and your computer.
That's the problem.. And it's bad.