This content has been marked as final. Show 3 replies
Octopus_Ong wrote:I'm always surprised when people seem surprised that my solutions work.
Thanks so much Sabre :) It worked!
I think the expression meant intersection without } ?No. The original
is greedy so swallows as much as possible. All my change does is to swallow only those characters which are not '}' which of course must terminate when it finds a '}' . One could have made the
reluctant by using
but I prefer to specify the set to accept.