rtumulur wrote:Is it? Until I did a bit of quick searching subsequent to your remark, I had thought JFX had sunk into oblivion. As a (almost exclusively) client-side developer, that really does not speak well for the promotion of JFX.
..Since JavaFX 2.0 is a top-priority at Oracle, ..
..I am hoping that this can be treated as "customer input". ..I'm glad you put that in inverted commas. Oracle staff are not likely to trawl the OTN looking for feed-back. And if they did, & saw a thread starting as this one did, they would probably move directly on to the next thread.
..As, you probably know javafx 2.0 is more or less the next-gen client-side offering on the java platform.(shrugs) Even if it is. A casual inspection of job ads suggests that server-side Java development jobs outnumber client-side development by about 20 to 1. I suspect Oracle is concentrating its efforts on the application area that is most common for Java.