This content has been marked as final. Show 6 replies
Who gave you that recommendation?
Also, please add the requirements that needs DD to be able to have a proper review of this issue
Those are two different products and they are not intended of a replacement of each other, they serve different use cases
"Who gave you that recommendation?"
Oracle. We were on the phone a week ago with the product development team. Are you from Oracle?
The exploration with DD is to reduce infrastructure requirements from the current deployment scenario. Glassfish is currently the recommended addition to deployment for the DMS component(again, Oracle previous recommendation ).
We were told by Oracle that DD had certain feature sets that were worth considering the move.(Local and native processing increases. Better scalability, etc.)
From the DDMigrationGuide.pdf from the DD docs(pg 7):
"Customers who are currently using AutoVue Desktop Version *+are strongly recommended to consider+*
migrating to AutoVue Desktop Deployment in order to take advantage of these advances today and
future innovations going forward."
That's why we are exploring. I am open to any counterpoint to this recommendation. My biggest concern is that we have a custom DMS integration component that we have to analyze the value of migration.
If you would like to private message me and you are from Oracle, I can give you the names of the individuals so you can speak with them. They have the details of the discussions up to this point.