This content has been marked as final. Show 5 replies
Sorry for the late response (due to traveling).
The time out in Jena Adapter for release 220.127.116.11 has been designed to be able to cancel an execution even inside a hasNext() call.
The way to use it is through the timeout= setting in the SPARQL query.
Please search for Test10.java in the following document.
Hope it helps,
We have a timeout in place, however we don't want to query to run all the way to the timeout length if our client has already canceled their request.
That being said, in a second thread, is there a way to kill the execution of the sparql query. For a Statement i can call Statment.cancel(). I was hoping that QueryExecution.abort() or QueryExection.close() would work, i also tried to close the model (connection) [ModelOracleSem.close()] and nothing forced the process on the database to die.
I also tried to load up the OracleQueryMgtServlet in my web.xml, however when I made the call to the URL with ?abortqid=<qid> it did nothing to the execution of the corresponding query. I found that's in the Joseki packaged with the Oracle Jena Adapater.
I appreciate your help.
I assume you have set qid in the sparql queries. e.g.
PREFIX ORACLE_SEM_FS_NS: <http://example.com/semtech#qid=8761>
?abortqid should work as long as your query is still being executed. Behind
the scenes, we invoke cancel on the JDBC statement object. The abort will
have no effect if you have already started fetching answers. For your application, does it take
a long time to complete fetching all answers?
If I understand your situation correctly, the following are true:
- Timeout works as expected
- Your client wants to cancel the query before timeout
Then can you shorten the timeout? Or maybe you can use add something like "limit 5 offset 10"
to your queries?
I will put the service call to the servlet. To abort the qid specified
How can I time the difference between query execution and fetching all answers? The first time .hasNext() is called is the longest wait.
The best thing you can do is to note down the elapsed time between issuing the query execution and completing the first hasNext(),
and the elapsed time between the first hasNext() and iterating through all the answers.