zarr wrote:I didn't delve deep enough into the source code to comment on the quality of the library (and there are concurrency experts here more suited for that). Nor do I think that having high level concurrency solutions is bad (nothing wrong with java.util.concurrent.*), so there was no criticism pointed at you.Kayaman wrote:a great way to shamelessly promote your libraryWhy promote? It's open source and I don't develop it alone!
If you see any problems in MultiLock please tell me, I whould like to discuss them. I just want find out the method how to develop software without deadlocks. And such use cases in forums is a posibility find the truth :)