Skip to Main Content

Oracle Database Discussions

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Oracle installation on RHEL 5.8 64 bit ???

beckMar 2 2013 — edited Mar 3 2013
Hi all,

Today, the system admin gave me the server with Redhat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5.8 64 bit.

I must check necessary packages for Oracle installation 11gR3 64 bit. Bellow oracle installation documents, I can review packages on this server.

Actually, I am similar to RHEL 5.5 or lower versions. On this server, already exists some packages was installed before, but I concern about detail version number (format _8.1 or _8.2 - you can view bold text bellow):

gcc-4.* (Oracle recommends)
gcc-4.1.2-52.el5_*8.1* (x86_64) --> Installed on this server.
gcc-c++-4.* (Oracle recommends)
gcc-c++-4.1.2-52.el5_*8.1* (x86_64) --> Installed on this server.
libgcc-4.*
libgcc-4.1.2-52.el5_*8.1* (i386)
libgcc-4.1.2-52.el5_*8.1* (x86_64)
libstdc++-4.*
libstdc++-4.1.2-52.el5_*8.1* (x86_64)
libstdc++-4.1.2-52.el5_*8.1* (i386)
libstdc++-devel-4.*
libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-52.el5_*8.1* (x86_64)
unixODBC-2.*
unixODBC-2.2.11-10.el5 (x86_64)
unixODBC-2.2.11-10.el5 (i386)
unixODBC-devel-2.*
unixODBC-devel-2.2.11-10.el5 (x86_64)
unixODBC-devel-2.2.11-10.el5 (i386)
glibc-2.*
glibc-2.5-81.el5_*8.2* (x86_64)
glibc-2.5-81.el5_*8.2* (i686)
glibc-devel-2.5-81.el5_*8.2* (x86_64)
glibc-common-2.5-81.el5_*8.2* (x86_64)
glibc-headers-2.5-81.el5_*8.2* (x86_64)

Someone said to me: Them should is _48, example:
gcc-4.1.2-48.el5 (x86_64)
libgcc-4.1.2-48.el5 (x86_64)
.....

I did not any server with RHEL 5.8 to testing for Oracle installation on it. At this time, I only allowed check necessary pkgs for Oracle installation.

So, I want ask : packages with _8.1 or _8.2 --> Are they good to installation Oracle database on RHEL 5.8 ??

Thanks so much.

Comments

Processing
Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.

Post Details

Locked on Mar 31 2013
Added on Mar 2 2013
4 comments
530 views