1 Reply Latest reply: Apr 23, 2013 6:40 AM by 991686 RSS

    Java Applet + Security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince

    987842
      I am trying to understand java blacklist.

      I am working on an applet and in my java console I get the following errors.

      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405605649 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405649631 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405733469 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405327880 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405327880 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405992865 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405327978 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405992725 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405327719 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405993102 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405802813 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405802919 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405324808 (we have 1366405324565)
      security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince 1366405994221 (we have 1366405324565)

      All my jars are signed and if there are any signed third party jars I resign the. Where can i read more about jar blacklisting. or what is causing these errors to be thrown.
        • 1. Re: Java Applet + Security: blacklist: hasBeenModifiedSince
          991686
          Number looks like a unix timestamp, IfModifiedSince is a HTTP Caching-Header. Maybe plugin calls home, lets someone third party ask for the signed jars, and than compares the two. You are "working on" it, is it possible that the applet you load is another one than the public accessible, maybe from a dev-server renamed to be the original one?

          Sorry, my fault, looks like a new behaviour, the timestamp shown is fix, it has nothing to do with my brain dump above.

          Edited by: 988683 on 23.04.2013 04:38