We are facing issues interpreting the decision-reports.
Example : The individual requires documentation if
the individual is of type A and
the individual needs to provide documentation for type B
the individual is of type C and
the individual needs to provide verification for type D
If any 1 set of inputs are provided, the rule will be proven. When the decision report is generated, it does not specify which inputs will be required at minimum.
The report displays all the inputs as unknown, So, how can we interpret the report to conclude, that at least 2 inputs will be required.