Oracle Analytics Cloud and Server Idea Lab

Home› Oracle Analytics› Oracle Analytics Idea Labs› Oracle Analytics Cloud and Server Idea Lab

Categories

Welcome to the Oracle Analytics Community: Please complete your User Profile and upload your Profile Picture

The maximum number of objects displayed per Catalog folder needs to be greatly increased more than 3

Delivered
142
Views
6
Comments
Chris Pfeifer
Chris Pfeifer Rank 5 - Community Champion
in Oracle Analytics Cloud and Server Idea Lab

Organization Name

University of California San Diego

Description

Only 300 objects are displayed (in alphabetical order) per folder in the OTBI (OBIEE) Catalog.

If a new object which is alphabetically later in the list is added to a full folder with 300 objects, the added object does not appear in the folder. However, if the same object is again copied and pasted into the full folder, the overwrite confirmation box appears. The system knows that the object already exists in the folder but doesn't display it if there are 300 objects already there that are earlier, alphabetically. 

This is a HUGE issue for our BI Authors because they are unable to find the alphabetically later objects by browsing the folder contents when creating a dashboard. However, search in the Catalog folder works but requires the Author to know a part of the object name. This display issue also makes the selection process for object migrations more complicated and time-consuming.

Use Case and Business Need

This is a HUGE issue for our BI Authors because they are unable to find the alphabetically later objects by browsing the folder contents when creating a dashboard. However, search in the Catalog folder works but requires the Author to know a part of the object name. This display issue also makes the selection process for object migrations more complicated and time-consuming.

Original Idea Number: 4ed9632f79

Tagged:
3
3 votes

Delivered · Last Updated

Comments

  • Marcelo Finkielsztein
    Marcelo Finkielsztein Rank 6 - Analytics Lead

    Had not noticed this likely because we do not have that many objects altogether in one folder, but it sdouns like an important limitation.

    Have you experienced limitations with the name lenght of an object?

    Kind regards,
    Marcelo Finkielsztein

  • Chris Pfeifer
    Chris Pfeifer Rank 5 - Community Champion

    Hi Marcelo,

    Yes, it's unusual! We are using a standardized folder structure for the different object types so that referential integrity is preserved when migrating objects/dashboards from DEV to TEST to PROD. It works quite well for us, except for the 300-object limitation we've recently hit in the folder which contains all of our Analyses for Dashboards. We have an SR currently open, but I forgot to put it in the ER. I'll try to edit it and add the SR.

    We haven't run up against a name length limitation yet, but we also try to keep our names concise.

    Cheers,

    Chris Pfeifer

  • Marcelo Finkielsztein
    Marcelo Finkielsztein Rank 6 - Analytics Lead

    Thanks for the comments  Our company uses lots of folders and subfolders. 
    I realize this approach helped us to avoid reaching 300 catalog objects per folder.

    I also hear you about the promotion dev -> test -> prod.  Tricky.

    Hope Oracle fulfills your request.
    Marcelo

  • bbci_BeverlyBaker
    bbci_BeverlyBaker Rank 3 - Community Apprentice

    This is mission critical for utilizing streamlined and architected folder design to support automated backups and report development lifecycles. But now we cannot see the analysis to add it to a dashboard? What a ridiculous limitation in a modern system.

    Come on Oracle - do better

  • bbci_BeverlyBaker
    bbci_BeverlyBaker Rank 3 - Community Apprentice

    It makes automation so hard when you are constantly navigating to different folder structures. But if they cannot fix this we may be up for rearchitecting.

  • Chris Pfeifer
    Chris Pfeifer Rank 5 - Community Champion

    As of OTBI 22A (FMW 12c), the number appears to have been increased to 1000.