Categories
- All Categories
- 15 Oracle Analytics Sharing Center
- 16 Oracle Analytics Lounge
- 216 Oracle Analytics News
- 43 Oracle Analytics Videos
- 15.7K Oracle Analytics Forums
- 6.1K Oracle Analytics Idea Labs
- Oracle Analytics User Groups
- 79 Oracle Analytics Trainings
- 15 Oracle Analytics Data Visualizations Challenge
- Find Partners
- For Partners
Different behavior from BI-Publisher output and ESS Output.
Summary
Different behavior from BI-Publisher output and ESS Output.
Content
Hello
Does someone has an idea why I have a different behavior when I run a report from BI-Publisher and the ESS Job that use the report ?
It seems absolute path is the proble in the Etext template... I've tried to use relative path and I have the same behavior.
The last fields cause me a headache:
<LEVEL> | LIST_G_ACCT/ | |
<MAXIMUM LENGTH> | <FORMAT> | <DATA> |
<NEW RECORD> | GL_TB_DATA | |
5 | Alpha | ‘”’ |
240 | Alpha | ACCT |
5 | Alpha | '”,”' |
240 | Alpha | ACCT_VALUE_DESC |
5 | Alpha | '”,' |
240 | Number | NET_ENDING_DR_BAL |
5 | Alpha | ',' |
240 | Number | NET_ENDING_CR_BAL |
5 | Alpha | ',”' |
240 | Alpha | /GLTRIALBALANCE/P_PERIOD_FROM |
5 | Alpha | '/' |
240 | Alpha | /GLTRIALBALANCE/P_PERIOD_TO |
5 | Alpha | '”' |
<END LEVEL> | G_ACCT | |
Here's the verion on the BI-Publisher used:
Any hint will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Answers
-
Could you please confirm NET_ENDING_CR_BAL and P_PERIOD_TO is present in same level in XML?
Could you please upload the XML and E-text ?
0