26B: Contradictory documentation on Redwood Workforce Structures Date Formats (Leading Zeros)

Hi everyone,

I wanted to start a discussion to get some clarification on a recent 26B release note regarding user-preferred date formats on the Redwood Workforce Structures pages.

The feature in question is documented here: View Effective Start Date in User Preferred Date Format on Workforce Structures Pages

The 26B documentation contains a frustrating contradiction regarding how leading zeros are handled.

The release note states:

"For the date formats of type MM/DD/YYYY, DD/MM/YYYY, or dd/m/YYYY, where the date or month is in double digits, the date on the UI won’t be prefixed with the digit 0 if the date holds a single digit. For example: If the date format selected is MM/DD/YYYY, which is a supported format, the date displayed on the page is 3/21/2026 instead of 03/21/2026."