Intercompany matching report
Content
Hi All,
I've a question about the standard structure of an intercompany matching report. My IC report has a Plug account that matches three revenues and three costs accounts (i.e. rev_1, rev_2...cst_1, cst_2...). So, the header of the IC report has these columns:
Entity | Partner | rev_1-entity | rev_2-entity | rev_3-partner | Variance |
cst_1-partner |
cst_2-partner | cst_3-entity | Variance | Total |
I don't understand why the accounts "rev_3-partner" and "cst_3-entity" are "inverted".
Instead, It should be:
Entity | Partner | rev_1-entity | rev_2-entity | rev_3-entity | Variance |
cst_1-partner |
cst_2-partner | cst_3-partner | Variance | Total |
Is there a particular set up? has anyone run into the same issue?
Tagged:
0