Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM Begin Now
To ensure that questions get required attention from community members and are NOT left unanswered, it’s important for the author to indicate (by selecting “Yes” or “No” when prompted) whether the question was answered. (newly added) Please note that it is also important to respond to EACH comment your question receives. Your Yes or No response ensures an accurate status for your question.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
SCORM 2004 vs. 1.2
Summary
eLearning Courses Require Output in SCORM 2004 vs. 1.2 due to course size/bookmarking - any issues with this?Content
The summary says it all. Does anyone currently use and/or know of any issues w/ SCORM 2004 content vs. SCORM 1.2?
I have some larger courses that were just converted from Flash and the vendor is telling me SCORM 2004 is required to support bookmarking. I wanted to check that this different SCORM version will not cause issues in the system before giving the go-head.
Also, if you do use 2004, please let me know if there are any special settings to consider when uploading content. In my testing, it seems the same as 1.2, but I'm not confident.
Tagged:
0