Learn about Redwood and be one of the first to join the conversation

Visit Redwood Community
SCORM 2004 vs. 1.2 — Cloud Customer Connect
You're almost there! Please answer a few more questions for access to the Applications content. Complete registration
Interested in joining? Complete your registration by providing Areas of Interest here. Register

SCORM 2004 vs. 1.2

Accepted answer
28
Views
8
Comments
edited May 4, 2020 4:37PM in Taleo Learn 8 comments

Summary

eLearning Courses Require Output in SCORM 2004 vs. 1.2 due to course size/bookmarking - any issues with this?

Content

The summary says it all. Does anyone currently use and/or know of any issues w/ SCORM 2004 content vs. SCORM 1.2?

I have some larger courses that were just converted from Flash and the vendor is telling me SCORM 2004 is required to support bookmarking. I wanted to check that this different SCORM version will not cause issues in the system before giving the go-head.

Also, if you do use 2004, please let me know if there are any special settings to consider when uploading content. In my testing, it seems the same as 1.2, but I'm not confident.

Howdy, Stranger!

Log In

To view full details, sign in.

Register

Don't have an account? Click here to get started!