Difference in calculations between Oracle Fixed Assets and EPBCS CAPEX
When an asset is tagged to 200DBL in the Oracle Fixed Assets Module it is calculated using a rate table that provides the forecasted depreciation based on those rates. However, when a new asset is created in the CAPEX module OOTB, the 200DBL (Declining Balance Year) Depreciation method is calculated differently. F
rom a planning perspective these results in two different results when planning a new asset in both the FA Module and the CAPEX module. Why are the calculations different in the systems, despite having the same asset characteristics?
Version (include the version you are using, if applicable):