Thank you for supporting the Cloud Customer Connect Community in 2024. It's a gift to work with you!

Look back
You're almost there! Please answer a few more questions for access to the Applications content. Complete registration
Interested in joining? Complete your registration by providing Areas of Interest here. Register
Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM   Begin Now
To ensure that questions get required attention from community members and are NOT left unanswered, it’s important for the author to indicate (by selecting “Yes” or “No” when prompted) whether the question was answered. (newly added) Please note that it is also important to respond to EACH comment your question receives. Your Yes or No response ensures an accurate status for your question.

For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.

Salary Components Best Practice

Summary:

We are considering to move from non-salary components to salary components. What are some obstacles that my happen during that transition? Is using salary components better than having more than one salary element? Some of the components being considered would be based on base, shift, job, department, tenure, location, etc.

With the components in mind, and just considering the tenure could the component rate change based on length of service? Perhaps .50/hr after 6 months and $1.00 after a year of service? How about length of service in that particular job? Would it be better to have two components such as Base & Tenure or would it be best not to use salary components and utilize two elements i.e. Base Salary & Tenure Salary?

Howdy, Stranger!

Log In

To view full details, sign in.

Register

Don't have an account? Click here to get started!