Thank you for supporting the Cloud Customer Connect Community in 2024. It's a gift to work with you!

Look back
You're almost there! Please answer a few more questions for access to the Applications content. Complete registration
Interested in joining? Complete your registration by providing Areas of Interest here. Register
Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM   Begin Now
To ensure that questions get required attention from community members and are NOT left unanswered, it’s important for the author to indicate (by selecting “Yes” or “No” when prompted) whether the question was answered. (newly added) Please note that it is also important to respond to EACH comment your question receives. Your Yes or No response ensures an accurate status for your question.

For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.

Absence Eligibility question

in Workforce Management 1 comment

Summary:

Temporary location changes and impact on the absence eligibility.

Content (required):

Dear Community, I need your support again.

There is the following scenario:

In a certain LDG, there are 2 types of rules for vacation eligibility, depending on location: thus, locations A,B,C are eligible for front-loaded vacation, while locations C,D,E are eligible for incremental vacation. There are cases when people move temporary between the locations. For example, an employee from location A moves temporary to location C. Consequently, the eligibility profile kicks in and the employee is now enrolled in the incremental vacation plan. We would like that employee to remain enrolled in the front-loaded vacation plan, which is not possible according to the eligibility set up.

Tagged:

Howdy, Stranger!

Log In

To view full details, sign in.

Register

Don't have an account? Click here to get started!