Payables and Cash Management - EBS (MOSC)

MOSC Banner

Question/Observation on Oracle Payment Register impact when change existing Bank Account name

edited Feb 16, 2010 2:23AM in Payables and Cash Management - EBS (MOSC) 3 commentsAnswered
Just curious to see if anyone else has observed something that I have run into.  In December 2008, we changed the name of an existing interal bank account in payable (internal meaning an account we use to pay suppliers) from CO154 AP/SP to Co154 AP/SP.  This impacts the BANK_ACCOUNT_NAME column in the AP_BANK_ACCOUNTS_ALL table. 

When we run the Payment Register for December 2008, the information for account Co154 AP/SP is not right - is missing payment activity.  Finally figured out that the other activity was in a whole other section of the report, under the name CO154 AP/SP (I should note that we have about 50-60 internal bank accounts active at any given time, and pay several thousands of payments each month).  So to see an consolidated view of the activity in that account, I had to print the separate page ranges for the two sections of data. 

Howdy, Stranger!

Log In

To view full details, sign in to My Oracle Support Community.

Register

Don't have a My Oracle Support Community account? Click here to get started.

Category Leaderboard

Top contributors this month

New to My Oracle Support Community? Visit our Welcome Center

MOSC Help Center