zfs vs svm: peformance consideration
Hello all,I have a T4-1 configured with a boot disk configured as an svm mirror and I have another t4-1 configured with a zfs mirror for the boot disk.
Doing some preliminary check to compare behaviours I found that the tar -x of the same 2GB file on /var/tmp/ (/var is a separate fs in both cases) is performing worse on the zfs configuration
Time to complete on svm config :
real 1:01.44
user 8.17
sys 29.07
time to complete on zfs config
real 1:49.13
user 9.17
sys 1:33.64
I'm starting the investigation but before to start I would like to understand if I'm simply missing something basic here.
Doing some preliminary check to compare behaviours I found that the tar -x of the same 2GB file on /var/tmp/ (/var is a separate fs in both cases) is performing worse on the zfs configuration
Time to complete on svm config :
real 1:01.44
user 8.17
sys 29.07
time to complete on zfs config
real 1:49.13
user 9.17
sys 1:33.64
I'm starting the investigation but before to start I would like to understand if I'm simply missing something basic here.
1