Shared Hierarchy definitions in Hyperion Planning
Assume the following case,
Account
|--------->AG1000 (Dynamic Calc)
|-------->AP1000 (Dynamic Calc)
|---------->AC1000 (Store)
|---------->AC1001 (Store)
|--------->AP2000 (Dynamic Calc)
|---------->AC2000 (Store)
|--------->AP3000 (Dynamic Calc)
|---------->AC3000 (Store)
|---------->SH1000 (Dynamic Calc)
|--------->AC1000 (Shared)
|--------->AC1001 (Shared)
|----------->SH1002 (Dynamic Calc)
|--------->SH1000 (Shared)
|--------->SH1001 (Shared)
|----------->SH1001 (Dynamic Calc)
|--------->SH1000 (Shared)
|--------->AC2000 (Shared)
Is there any limitations/issues defining this Base & Shared Hierarchy in Hyperion Planning/Essbase?