Enterprise Service Automation (ESA) - PSFT (MOSC)

MOSC Banner

SR 3-19504350687 : Expenses: Vendors vs Employees - Impact on PayCycle, EFT files and Positive Pay F

edited Mar 6, 2019 12:53PM in Enterprise Service Automation (ESA) - PSFT (MOSC) 2 commentsAnswered ✓

We are applying a workaround but would rather be using/configuring the Expense module correctly using the Expenses Employee tables vs Payables Vendor tables.  Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

Problem Summary

---------------------------------------------------

Expenses: Vendors vs Employees - Impact on PayCycle, EFT files and Positive Pay Files

Problem Description

---------------------------------------------------

We are currently on FSCM 9.2 PUM 21/Tools 8.54.25.

We are implementing the Expense module and have encounter an issue where the vendor/employee info is left blank on the positive pay file. This is probably due to the fact that we are using the Expenses employee tables not the Payables Vendor tables. What is the best configuration for using the Employee tables as it relates to the Payables PayCycle, EFT files and Positive Pay files? Do we have something configured improperly which would cause the issue with missing employee/vendor info in the file?

Howdy, Stranger!

Log In

To view full details, sign in to My Oracle Support Community.

Register

Don't have a My Oracle Support Community account? Click here to get started.

Category Leaderboard

Top contributors this month

New to My Oracle Support Community? Visit our Welcome Center

MOSC Help Center