We just need your feedback on a question urgently.

in regards to number of records being used in Territory Management?   For business reasons we’re forced to set-up in one region a parallel hierarchy and here we would have to either use Site ID or Registry ID level  (but still using geographical territories!) We do assume that the number of records would be increased by roughly 250k records. This most likely just for half a year.   Reason for raising this question is, that many years back we were facing some major issues when using Named Account territories and loading records   via web ADI. I do remember that Oracle raised