F0011 Batch Header affected by ARCTOOLS archiving on IBMi
Our E1 9.2 release is on IBMi on Power.
Question for you who archive with ARCTOOLS from DCSoftware.
Does your E1 archive environment have its own F0011 Batch Header table, so as to be decoupled from production environment?
Do you agree that having F0011 batch header in archive environment is a good idea?
Currently, our production PRODDTA and archive JDEARCDTA environments both point to our single instance of F0011 Batch Header that resides in production.
After archiving E1 tables with ARCTOOLS, when we are signed onto the E1 archive environment, there are no batch headers because our next run of R007031 in production had cleaned up production F0011 Batch Header, deleting all batch headers for which no detail existed (because detail records had been moved to library JDEARCDTA).