Acme Packet (MOSC)

MOSC Banner

Coexistence of ike-interface and sip-interface. Is it possible?

in Acme Packet (MOSC) 4 commentsAnswered

Hello fellows.

I have a configuration of IPSec on my SBC, where tunnel is organized via public IP address 11.22.33.44, and sip configuration bases on private IP address 192.168.20.1. Both - ike and sip interfaces are located in the same realm "IPSEC", so SBC knows that outgoing sip traffic must be tunneled. Generally, I connect two sip servers with their private IP addresses via IPsec tunnel, established between SBC and Firewall on remote side. I think this scheme is considered as canonical.

I wonder if somebody created IPsec tunnel, where ike-interface and sip-interface share the same IP address like on the scheme below? In this case sip server #2 will be connected to Cisco Firewall via IPsec and will know nothing about sip server #1. Is it possible at all?

Howdy, Stranger!

Log In

To view full details, sign in to My Oracle Support Community.

Register

Don't have a My Oracle Support Community account? Click here to get started.

Category Leaderboard

Top contributors this month

Instructions for posting

×

1. Select a discussion category from the picklist.


2. Enter a title that clearly identifies the subject of your question.


3. In the body, insert detailed information, including Oracle product and version.


Please abide by the Oracle Community guidelines and refrain from posting any customer or personally identifiable information (PI/CI).


Cloud / Fusion customers - Our Cloud community has moved! Please go to Cloud Customer Connect .


New to My Oracle Support Community? Visit our Welcome Center

MOSC Help Center