What is the difference between the "Average Learning Item Rating" and "Overall Learning Item Rating"?
the calculation logic sheet shows the same formula for both. Is there a reason to pick one over the other?
Overall Learning Item Rating = Sum(Rating)/Count(Rating) where Rating is not null
This is an Overall Rating without consideration of any dimension like Learner, Learning Item, Workforce attributes like Department, Job Code. Would be suitable for Performance Tiles in Workbooks where dimensions are not used.
Average Learning Item Rating - Workforce Structures has similar formula. However, this metric should be generally used along with dimensions like Learning Item, Learner, Workforce attributes like Manager, Job Code, Location, Department etc. This metric is more granular. It is suitable for Pivot tables, Graphs, Tables etc where dimensions are shown. This metric represents the average rating at the grain of the dimension member.
Overall Learning Item Rating will be a constant value across the grain of dimension.
Average Learning Item Rating would vary across dimension members.
Hi, I'm new to OTBI & FDI and need your help. Is it possible to do a report to identify missing default expense account in FDI or OTBI? Thanks for your help.
Hi Team We are using SCM- Maintenance subject areas for reporting . We enabled the Asset related DFFs (CSE_ASSETS_B) under Data Configuration successfully but the Asset DFFs are not reflecting under Descriptive Flexfield Folder . We do not see any Asset folder even under the Descriptive Flexfield folder . Please advise if…
We made some changes in the Fusion UI, and those changes were reflected correctly in OTBI but not in FDI. To refresh the data in FDI, the Oracle support team advised me to reload the relevant functional area (Absence Management). I navigated to Application Administration → Human Capital Management, selected Absence…
Data are synchronized with Oracle HCM and I can see PN 2470, which was terminated in the past. If I add any assignment information I find no records, why?
In an analysis/report, when the Bottom Up Manager details are selected from the hierarchy, the Top Position Person record drops out. This is due to the fact that this top level position does not have a record in the Fusion table : PER_MANAGER_HRCHY_CF which is the source to load OAX$OAC.DW_MANAGER_CF_DH . The requirement…