Dext3r Bronze Trophy

Amount remaining appears to be the field you want to use. So you could set a criterion to just return any transactions where amount remaining > 0.

How odd, unapplied, applied and payment all appear to be unrecognized fields and can't be used in a transaction search. I'm not sure how you could achieve this without any of these. 🤔

I'm not sure if that's an option, but would be good to know if it does work! Alternatively, you could do a Map/Reduce script, you can build the search within the script and it can process multiple records at a time so it's much faster than a CSV upload.

Ah, in which case you'd need to lookup making your own Mass Update and Mass Update Script. NetSuite Help Center Personally, I would just download the CSV of your results and upload the customer records via CSV whilst setting inactive to True. It may take a lot longer to run than a mass update but it may take you longer to…

Your account manager would be the first person I'd ask for this. I'd imagine if not then they'll at least point you in the right direction.

I think you need to rebuild your search as a Custom Inactivate Vendors mass update. Go to your page of mass updates then under Contact Management is Inactivate Vendors. Click that and rebuild the criteria so that it returns your list of vendors to inactivate and then run the update.

I would imagine you can. You probably want to find someone with good knowledge of customizing the mobile app. You would need to make a custom process to overwrite the default one and then I think all you need to do is edit the binScan page to hide the Data Table of the list of bins. So instead of seeing the table of bins…

Thanks Gustavo, it's a real pain trying to get users to adhere to the new system and to stop making manual IFs. I will do my best though as it does sound like the right way forward. Thank you for sharing your experience!

And that's different to what I'm using here? Ah well. Looks like I will have to take your suggestion and go through it manually for now then. Thank you for your insights Tigran.

It seems the field group has this 'Single Column' checkbox set True. Disabling this has resolved the issue.

The Sales Orders are all fulfilled, there's nothing left to pick. I think pick tasks were created but then the IF was created manually, so the pick tasks still exist and are outstanding. I just need to close/delete them.

Thanks Bry, I'll follow up with our SCA developer and get them to work on it.

No worries Angelica, thank you for the steer. I'll reach out to support on this one.

D

Thanks Trixie, I was worried that might be the approach, as it'll be a lot of work to configure. But it does seem to be the only viable approach.

If you want them to view other subsidiary COAs but no other information from those subsidiaries, I think a saved search would be your best option. But if you need them to also interact with those COA records whilst restricting subsidiary information in other areas that will be an issue. You could otherwise create a new…

Nice, I think I have that then. What you need I believe is a Contact Search with these fields. Customer : Role = Customer Fields… Role Then to upload the changes will likely be a Contact CSV upload.

Ah, ok. But what is the issue here? Do you just see no options for other roles to choose?

This should be in the access section of the customer record, you should see the role here (mine is also a custom customer center just named differently to yours). You could also update this for all your customers by doing a customer CSV update.

Yea, after investigating further I do believe Mark and my initial assumptions were correct and that there is no way to append new selections to these results. I will opt to download the data with a saved search and then reupload it via CSV.

I was able to clear these lines by going to the Purchase Order then the subtab NS WMS From here I could select the WMS Open Tasks and delete them to then receive the missing line items in via the app once more. The process appeared to get stuck because we were trying to apply landed costs to items on this Purchase Order,…

Odd that it specifies SuiteScript. Perhaps there's some script that doesn't know what to do with negative values? I'd start by looking at what Scripts you have deployed on your estimate record. If this is happening when you try to save the record, then it's most likely a User Event type script. Customization > Scripting >…

Typically you can set the list of results you see per list in your preferences, but I believe this is just a hard limit on recent records. I don't imagine you have any way of increasing it. My limit appears to be 99 though, so it's odd to me that you only get 96, unless 96 is what's set in your preferences.

Thanks Niks, I unfortunately don't have time to learn to build this in Analytics, it's always been a huge pain to get anything working correctly in that. I'll leave this for now and may come back to it if the issue arises again. I believe the stakeholder in this has lost interest for now. Sorry about that, do really…

Ah, thanks for the push Pratik, it did help me find the solution I wanted. I ended up customizing the Center like so: Add a new Center Category to the Center > Center Tab of the Center used by the role in question. 2. Add the links for the Center Category 3. Create custom Center Links for any links that aren't provided by…

Thanks for clarifying Angela!

It was the language issue. Frustrating that only after this did I realize that it's actually a custom field and I could have just renamed it across all instances to begin with. 😫 Ah well, worth the learning!

I see, thank you for clarifying that MoonK, really helpful. I am still accepting answers if others have more guidance to add.

I appreciate the push Red, less so the untested AI results. {binonhand} isn't even a field, at least for Item type search. It did at least steer me closer towards the solution, so thank you for that. This, I believe, is the working setup.

Yea, sorry, I see what you mean Niks, but this is returning false results. It's the same as if I were to add * as an item on the item criteria. Instead of it returning just transactions with the 3 shipping items I listed, it will just return all results that have * in them, not just those with only the 3 items I'm looking…