Toanne Termeer Bronze Medal

Hi @Katerina Winklerova-Oracle Thanks for your response. I removed all the sorts and try it again with the Account Period And the Period Name but with none of these the results is changing. It is still Apr2022 Aug2022 Dec 2022 Feb 2022 I'm not sure if your example is right because i don't see al the information. But May is…

Hi @Katerina Winklerova-Oracle I did try that for the 'Period Name' and the 'Accounting Period'. When I open the 'Sort Period Name' I see this screen Whatever I do or try the order of the colomns are not changing. It must be: Jan, Feb, Mar, May, Jun, Jul, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec But it only changes form A-Z or form Z-A I don't…

Hi @Katerina Winklerova-Oracle Thank you for the update. Too bad this isn't available yet and I will vote for the enhancement. I have now notified our customer that they must list multiple Vendor Returns in 1 transaction (Vendor Return Authorization). They do not link this to a purchase order, which makes this possible for…

Hi @Niks Blando-Oracle It looks like the issue is back now. I don't really understand why there is a difference in the PD and SB regarding the use of filling fields. In the production and in de sandbox I use the custom Role 'Production Manager'. The SB is recently updated so no difference in permissions. We've cleared the…

Hi @Joy Noreen Magoling-Oracle Thanks for looking into it. I understand a conversion is not possible, but how does it work in relation to intercompany transactions? Italy Purchase an Inventory Item in the Netherlands and this Intentory Item for Italy is an Assembly Item for the Netherlands. Is there a possible connection…

Hi @Joy Noreen Magoling-Oracle Thank you for looking in to it. It is a pity that this again does not work at Intercompany. You would say that NetSuite is very strong in this, but unfortunately it has many limitations. How can we solve the following scenario? Our customer uses standard Cost and wants to use the same item…

Hi @Patrick Fresnosa-Oracle The formula with the AND in stead of the OR is much more common if you ask me. So that will definitely work for us. Also the 'Actions - Recalculate Financial Data seems to work. Thanks! Regards Toanne

Hi @Niks Blando-Oracle Thanks for your comment. We are currently in the same situation and are very curious about a suitable solution. We have now reached the point where we have found out that we have to take over ALL the manufacturing settings (Billof Materials AND Manfucaturing Routins) for all subsidiaries in order to…

Hi @RKrol I'm curious how this was eventually resolved. We are running into the same issue.

Hello @Patrick Fresnosa-Oracle So if I understand you correctly, when I remove that part of the formula my issue is solved? Is that the same with the formula of % complete (the last row)? Any idea what to do with the warning of the Project Calculations denominator? Thanks in advanced. Regards Toanne

Hi @Patrick Fresnosa-Oracle Here are the screenshots of the planning view: No Criteria Results Tab: Results in View: In the project Schedule Overview I do have some Formulas (for the green/red buttons) do you mean these formulas? Thank you for working out the options for the reminders and reports when the actual time is…

Hi @Patrick Fresnosa-Oracle I don't have formulas in my Planning view. It's a pity that this is normal behaviour, because in reality it can also be different. What would be the best practice to deal with this situation? Thanks again. Regards Toanne

Hi @Niks Blando-Oracle Thank you for looking in to this issue. It is a pity that this cannot be performed for several subsidiaries. I voted for the enhancements but given the number of votes I don't see this happening for the time being. Regards, Toanne

Hi @Patrick Fresnosa-Oracle Thank you for your answer. In itself this behavior can be explained and also cooperate if we know what the behavior is, and that is clear for now. There is a work around so I think we can work with that. But what is the issue with a task being 'completed' when the status is still 'in Progress'?…

Hi @Niks Blando-Oracle What is mean is that I use the same User Role (Production Manager) in the Sandbox and in the Production Enviroment. There are no differences in the user roles between these enviroments. For the item in both enviroments is enough inventory available. I don't think it depends on the item, the behavior…

Hi Guru's, Is there maybe an update on this request? This is still an issue for our customer. When they use the 'Mark Work Orders Released' option (Transactions - Manufacturing - Mark Work Orders Released) in some way the WO will get the status Closed and Released in 1 second. When the WO had the status Closed it seems…

Hi @Joy Noreen Magoling-Oracle Thank you for your answer, but what i see now is only the row of the transaction with the highest value. What I need in this view is the New Unit Cost of the Inventory Cost Revaulation transaction 7343 - 15/04/2022 4601 - 06/04/2022 What i see if use your setup i only see the Cost of the…

Hi @Joy Noreen Magoling-Oracle You say it's Standard Behaviour that "The total inventory detail quantity must be XXX." In some ways our customer reproduce more in the related WO en need this quantity in the head WO. So in our customers case it's not always the same quantity. I thougt this wasn't an issue or that this was a…

Hi @Joy Noreen Magoling-Oracle In this case the 154 is correct, they have built more then required thats why the quantity is 154 in stead of 144. It happens regularly in practice, how can we solve this error? Regards, Toanne

Hi Joy, The Inventory Detail gives the right value of the related WO. We did create more on WO645 than we needed for WO644. Should that be an issue? I assume we can use the extra build quantity only for the related WO? Regards Toanne

Hi @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle I also just noticed that on Location Level you can set the WMS Account. If we create Inventory by the scanner this account will be used for the inventory adjustment. So no workflow is needed. Answer ID 69368 Regards Toanne

Hi @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle I just add an new Trigger in my workflow After Record Submit, and now the Account field is changed to the correct account. So this issue is solved for now. Thanks again for your help. Regards Toanne

Hi @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle I will wait for your results of the investigation. Thanks for that. Regards, Toanne

Hi @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle I just tested it with the workflow on Released and still no account 6205 as Adjustment account. In the system notes it is set on the 0504 account but in the workflow LOG the Account should be set correctly to 6205 But i don't see it in the Inventory Adjustment: Hope you can find anything for…

Hi @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle The Adjustment account that is set by Script (RESTlet) 0504. The workflow log indicates that it has been changed, but you do not see this change in the system notes. -Toanne

Hi @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle Thanks for your answer. If I use a Role were the Subsidiary is already set and i create a new Inventory Adjustment the account is filled in correctly by the workflow. If I do this in the administrator role (what is less important) and I use your settings in the workflow the account will be…

Additional question on this subject is that not all the roles can have acces to 'choose' the Adjustment Account. Is this also possible to enable this field for some roles? I tried a workflow but that also didn't work. Any tips?

Hi @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle It is understandable that you cannot provide a clear solution for this. But it's good to know that this can be done with script. We have our own scripter in house so he can take a look at this. Thanks for your help. Regards Toanne

Hi @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle Thanks for looking in to it, but that's not such good news. Is there perhaps a work around via case statements in a workflow or something with which we can show the correct data? Or is filtering really only possibility on the field? I hope there is a solution anyway. Anyone have an idea? Or is…

Hi @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle No Problem, I will wait for your findings. Thnx for looking in to it!