Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM Begin Now
To ensure that questions get required attention from community members and are NOT left unanswered, it’s important for the author to indicate (by selecting “Yes” or “No” when prompted) whether the question was answered. (newly added) Please note that it is also important to respond to EACH comment your question receives. Your Yes or No response ensures an accurate status for your question.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
Profile Re-architecture: Field Mapping
Summary
Which fields to select DFFs or standard existing fields?Content
Hi All
We have started to do the field mapping in our development environment for Profiles.
In the new model you can no longer re-label the existing field labels via Configuration and this needs to be done via Personalization (HCM Experience Studio). This is a step backwards as we could do the label changes directly via configuration and also we need to do the translations in another 5 languages also this way.
We are considering now whether to map all fields to DFFs as this is easier to configure to change the labels/translate. Another known issue is that a mixture of both DFFs and existing fields will not work for some of content sections as we cannot change the sequence.
Tagged:
1