Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM Begin Now
To ensure that questions get required attention from community members and are NOT left unanswered, it’s important for the author to indicate (by selecting “Yes” or “No” when prompted) whether the question was answered. (newly added) Please note that it is also important to respond to EACH comment your question receives. Your Yes or No response ensures an accurate status for your question.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
Functional US Payroll question (not system-specific) in regards to paying W-2 or 1099
Summary:
My client is asking the following question: Based upon my research: when police, who are theoretically “off duty”, provide security services for County buildings, they are still employees and must be paid through payroll (W-2) not as independent contractors (1099). They use County police cars and equipment and wear County uniforms while providing these services. Are there any exceptions related to public safety of which I’m unaware?
Content (required):
Does anyone have any insight into whether a person must be paid via payroll (W-2)?
Version (include the version you are using, if applicable):
N/A
Code Snippet (add any code snippets that support your topic, if applicable):
Tagged:
1