You're almost there! Please answer a few more questions for access to the Applications content. Complete registration
Interested in joining? Complete your registration by providing Areas of Interest here. Register
Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM   Begin Now
To ensure that questions get required attention from community members and are NOT left unanswered, it’s important for the author to indicate (by selecting “Yes” or “No” when prompted) whether the question was answered. (newly added) Please note that it is also important to respond to EACH comment your question receives. Your Yes or No response ensures an accurate status for your question.

For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.

Rate definition is taking FTE from position rather than from assignment

edited May 3, 2023 4:42PM in Payroll and Global Payroll Interface (GPI) 4 comments

Summary:

Derived rate definition contributor has the box ticked to return FTE value. But the value is being prorated up by the position FTE, rather than the employee's assignment FTE.

Content (required):

Employee is in a position which is 40 working hours on 40 standard hours, i.e. full time, 1.0 FTE

However, the employee's assignment has position sync flag disabled, and at assignment level the employee is working 20 working hours on 40 standard working hours, i.e. 0.5 FTE (jobshare). The salary basis holds their actual salary, i.e. half the rate of a full time worker.

We have an element rate definition that retrieves the salary basis value (part time actual amount) and has the "Return Full-Time Rate" ticked, so this should return the salary that a full-timer would receive

Tagged:

Howdy, Stranger!

Log In

To view full details, sign in.

Register

Don't have an account? Click here to get started!