Has anyone noticed that the PO Status is backwards?
Summary
PO Status is backwardsContent
Hi All,
Has anyone else noticed that the PO Status is somewhat backwards?
For example, if a requester is proactive and knows that their goods or services has been delivered or rendered, they will go into the system and receive against their PO before the AP Team matches the corresponding Invoice to that PO. In this case, the PO Status shows up as "Closed for Receiving" - I feel that this is misleading and somewhat confusing to everyone involved. The requester has already received against their PO, we are just waiting for AP to match the Invoice against the PO, shouldn't the PO Status be "Closed for Invoicing" or "Pending Invoice"?
0